In a significant shift threatening the pillars of responsible finance, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) recently issued a directive mandating that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac consider cryptocurrency in mortgage loan risk assessments. This move is emblematic of a broader trend toward government overreach, where regulators begin to meddle with financial instruments that have long been deemed too volatile for reliable underwriting.
Signed by FHFA Director William J. Pulte, this directive symbolizes a troubling integration of cryptocurrency into one of America’s most sacred institutions: home lending. This is a policy crafted not from a place of stability and prudence but rather from a misguided vision that seeks to align with President Donald Trump’s statement of making the U.S. “the crypto capital of the world.” While innovation is essential, it must not come at the expense of sound financial practice.
The directive demands that housing finance giants devise proposals allowing digital assets as collateral without compelling borrowers to first convert these assets into U.S. dollars. This is a dangerous precedent that undermines the fundamental principle of financial soundness, which requires an asset to be stable and verifiable. Historically, cryptocurrency has faced exclusion from financial frameworks due to its inherent volatility and regulatory ambiguity. That should raise red flags, not trigger a push for inclusion.
The timing of this decision is particularly alarming, coming amid rising inflation and economic uncertainty. The government’s direct involvement in crypto assets suggests a trend of umbrella policies that not only destabilize traditional values but also present additional risks to the very economic fabric that sustains our nation.
As the order suggests, cryptocurrency may offer a novel avenue for wealth accumulation; however, it is imperative to understand that such wealth should stem from personal accountability and stable investments rather than speculative ventures embraced by corporate elites. The directive states that only those digital assets stored on regulated exchanges can be considered, but it still creates a slippery slope where the line between prudent lending and reckless speculation becomes blurred.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, put under government control during the financial crisis of 2008, were intended to serve American homeowners, not facilitate risky behavior in the pursuit of unregulated asset classes. The agencies are now expected to submit their proposals for reviews, a process fraught with potential for further bureaucratic entanglement and inefficiency.
Watch: Mastercard stock jumps as it links Fiserv’s new stablecoin to its global payments network
