Connect with us

caucus

Iowa caucus chaos due to ‘coding error’: Officials

A new mobile app was supposed to help United States Democratic officials quickly gather information from some 1,700 caucus sites throughout Iowa. Instead, a “coding issue” within the app is being blamed for delays that left the results unknown the morning after the first-in-the nation presidential nominating contest and caused chaos Monday night. Glitches with a…

Iowa caucus chaos due to ‘coding error’: Officials

A new mobile app was supposed to help United States Democratic officials quickly gather information from some 1,700 caucus sites throughout Iowa. Instead, a “coding issue” within the app is being blamed for delays that left the results unknown the morning after the first-in-the nation presidential nominating contest and caused chaos Monday night.
Glitches with a new mobile app Monday caused confusion, and some caucus organisers were forced to call in results for the state party to record manually, introducing delays and the possibility of human error. Iowa Democratic Party Chairman Troy Price said the delays were not the result of a breach and party systems were secure.
“While the app was recording data accurately, it was reporting out only partial data. We have determined that this was due to a coding issue in the reporting system,” Price said in a statement on Tuesday, adding the issue has since been fixed. “The application’s reporting issue did not impact the ability of precinct chairs to report data accurately.”
More:

Who are the 2020 US Democratic presidential candidates?

US election 2020: What are presidential primaries and caucuses?

US elections 2020: When are the debates, primaries, conventions?

The Iowa Democratic Party told presidential campaigns it will release more than half of Monday’s delayed caucus results at 4pm local time (22:00 GMT) on Tuesday.
“We have always said that we have a paper trail in this process,” Price told campaigns on a briefing call. “We’ve always had to chase down results.”
Price said that the results would be released as they are finalised.
US Department of Homeland Security Acting Secretary Chad Wolf told Fox News on Tuesday that there was no indication of “any malicious cyberactivity”. He added that Iowa Democrats declined his department’s offer to test the reporting app. That’s not unusual, as outside security firms do similar testing. The state party had said previously that it had worked closely with security experts to test the app.
‘A mess’ 
Des Moines County Democratic Chair Tom Courtney said he heard that in precincts across his county, including his own, the mobile app was “a mess”. When precinct leaders called Democratic Party headquarters, “they weren’t answering the phones”, Courtney said.
The problems were an embarrassment for a state that has long sought to protect its prized status as the first contest in presidential primaries and the nation’s first vetter of candidates. The delay was certain to become fodder for critics who argued that the caucuses – party meetings that can be chaotic, crowded and messy – are antiquated and exclusionary.

Democratic 2020 US presidential candidate and US Senator Elizabeth Warren speaks at a caucus night rally in Des Moines, Iowa [Rick Wilking/Reuters] 

The Iowa Democratic Party pressed forward with the new reporting system amid warnings about the possibility of hacking and glitches. Party officials said they took numerous security precautions and maintained that any errors would be easily correctable because of backups and a paper trail.
But organisers running precincts in Iowa didn’t get to test the app beforehand. Iowa party officials had said they would not be sending the new mobile app to precinct chairs for downloading until just before the caucuses to narrow the window for any interference.
Some precinct chairs said they had trouble downloading or logging into the app and didn’t use it.
The apps were barely working Monday night, according to a person involved in processing the data who requested anonymity to discuss the party’s internal system. That forced party aides to record results from the precincts via phone and enter them manually into a database. Officials were left using photos of results to validate outcomes and ensure accuracy.

Democratic US presidential candidate Senator Amy Klobuchar speaks at her rally following the Iowa caucus in Des Moines, Iowa [Brenna Norman/Reuters] 

Jonathan Green, who chaired a precinct in Lone Tree, Iowa, said that when he tried to put the results into the reporting app, he kept getting a confusing error message: “Unknown protocol. The address specifies a protocol [e.g., “wxyz:??”.] the browser does not recognise, so the browser cannot properly connect to the site.”
He said he ultimately gave up and tried to call in the results to the party. Like others, he was put on hold for an extended period of time. In the end, it took hours to report results from his small site, he said.
Risky
The slowdown was exacerbated by the fact that the party was for the first time attempting to report three different sets of data – an initial headcount of each candidates’ support, a count after supporters had realigned, and the state delegate winners.
“We found inconsistencies in the reporting of three sets of results,” the party said in a statement. “This is simply a reporting issue, the app did not go down and this is not a hack or an intrusion. The underlying data and paper trail is sound and will simply take time to further report the results.”
President Donald Trump’s campaign quickly seized on the issue to sow doubt about the validity of the results.
“Quality control = rigged?” Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale tweeted Monday evening, adding an emoji with furrowed brows.
Richard L Hasen, an election expert and professor of law and political science at University of California, Irvine School of Law, cautioned against jumping to conclusions about the integrity of the election.
“Most of the time when there is a problem with an election it turns out to be the result of administrative incompetence rather than someone cheating or some outside interference,” Hasen said.

Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden and wife Jill Biden at a caucus night campaign rally in Des Moines, Iowa [John Locher/AP Photo]

Deploying new technology this close to an election is always a risky proposition, said Lawrence Norden, an elections expert with The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. Norden said it’s akin to a major retailer using new cash registers for the first time on Black Friday.
“To roll out a new technology without really testing it and making it available as early as possible and giving folks the opportunity to challenge it and work out all the bugs is a high-stakes decision which I think is proving to be problematic today,” Norden said.
Norden said party officials were wise to slow down the reporting to ensure accurate results, given concerns of another round of election interference by Russia or other hostile governments seeking to undermine US democracy.
“People aren’t going to remember in two weeks that these results were late, but you can bet if the results changed dramatically they would,” Norden said. “Those of us who work in the election space support accuracy over speed.”
Ruth Thompson, who chaired a precinct at Lincoln High School in Des Moines, said she did not use the app to report results because organisers had problems trying to download and test it.

Democratic presidential candidate Senator Bernie Sanders speaking to supporters at his rally in Des Moines, Iowa, US [Carlo Allegri/Reuters] 

“We just came to a consensus that nobody was happy with the app,” she said. She also did not try to report her site’s results over the phone after hearing reports of long delays in answering the line at state headquarters, she said.
Instead, veteran caucusgoers at her site used calculators to compute the delegate allocation and then texted a photo of the results to Polk County Democratic Party officials, who drove it to state party headquarters.
Thompson said the delays in results were unfortunate because the process went “remarkably smoothly” in other ways.

Democratic presidential candidate and former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg stands with his husband Chasten while addressing supporters at his rally at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, US [Jonathan Ernst/Reuters] 

Continue Reading…

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

caucus

Iowa caucus results delayed due to ‘quality checks’

West Des Moines, Iowa – The results of the Iowa caucuses, the first voting contest of the US 2020 presidential election season, have been delayed “due to quality checks”, the Iowa Democratic Party said late on Monday. “The integrity experienced a delay in the results due to quality checks and the fact that the [Iowa Democratic…

Iowa caucus results delayed due to ‘quality checks’

West Des Moines, Iowa – The results of the Iowa caucuses, the first voting contest of the US 2020 presidential election season, have been delayed “due to quality checks”, the Iowa Democratic Party said late on Monday.
“The integrity experienced a delay in the results due to quality checks and the fact that the [Iowa Democratic Party] is reporting out three data sets for the first time,” the party said in an emailed statement, adding later that there was “simply a reporting issue” and there had been no “hack or intrusion” with the app the precincts were using to report results. It was unclear when exactly official results would be announced.
More:

Who are the 2020 US Democratic presidential candidates?

US election 2020: What are presidential primaries and caucuses?

US elections 2020: When are the debates, primaries, conventions?

As Iowans eagerly awaited the results, Senators Amy Klobuchar, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, as well as former Vice President Joe Biden and former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg appeared in their respective campaign headquarters to reassure their supporters.
“We know one thing: we are punching above our weight,” said Klobuchar, the first of the 10 candidates participating in Iowa’s caucuses to address the delay.
Warren told her supporters that they may not “know the results from tonight, but tonight has already shown that Americans have a hunger for big structural change”.

Attendees sit in a gymnasium during a caucus in Des Moines, Iowa [Jonathan Ernst/Reuters]

Both Biden and Sanders told those gathered at their respective headquarters they had a “good” feeling about the results.
“When those results are announced, I have a good feeling we’re going to be doing very, very well in Iowa,” Sanders said.
“We feel good about where we are, so it’s on to New Hampshire,” Biden said, referring to next week’s primary in the northeastern US state.
Buttigieg, speaking later in the night, said: “Tonight, Iowa chose a new path … to say that the time has come to turn the page and start a new chapter”.
‘Inconsistencies’
Without the results fromnearly 1,700 precinct sitesacross the state, it is still anyone’s game. Polls going into Monday night’s caucuses indicated Sanders and Biden leading a still crowded field of candidates, followed by Klobuchar, Warren and Buttigieg.
Iowa, a Midwestern state, kicks off the presidential nominating contest every four years. In 2016, 171,000 of the two million registered voters attended a caucus. The state Democratic party leadership and campaigns are hoping for much higher numbers this time around, especially given that the country is deeply divided along party lines and its opinions of the current president.
The Republicans also held caucuses across the state, with current President Trump declared the winner early in the night.

Attendees sit in a gymnasium during a caucus in Des Moines, Iowa [Jonathan Ernst/Reuters]

In a first this year, raw numbers from all precincts will be released for both rounds of caucusing, as well as the final overall results. That means the public will be able to see exactly how less-popular candidates did across the board. In the past, only final numbers were released. That change appeared to have contributed to the delay of Monday night’s results, leading to confusion and frustration across the state.

The first step in what the Democrats hoped would be a march to the White House, has been a colossal misstep.
A new system, which would feed results from the caucuses across the state to the local party headquarters failed in spectacular style and to make matters worse, the back-up plan didn’t work either.
The world was watching Iowa. For the first time in three years, we should have been given an idea who the voters wanted to tackle Donald Trump in November, which candidate they thought was more electable, had a better plan. Instead, what we got was anger and confusion.
From what can be pulled together from local observers, it looks like Bernie Sanders is going to win, Elizabeth Warren and Pete Buttigieg are going to do well and former Vice President Joe Biden had a very bad night.
But we don’t know for certain. At least, not yet. The results will be published sometime on Tuesday, while everyone is campaigning in New Hampshire. It’s bad news for the Democratic Party. It’s bad news for the whole idea of caucuses and their complex, messy nature.

“We found inconsistencies in the reporting of three sets of results,” IDP Communications Director Mandy McClure said in a statement.
“In addition to the tech systems being used to tabulate results, we are also using photos of the results and a paper trail to validate that all the results match and ensure that we have confidence and accuracy in the numbers we report,” she added. “This is simply a reporting issue, the app did not go down and this is not a hack or an intrusion. The underlying data and paper trail is sound and will simply take time to further report and the results.”
The delay was a sobering moment in what had been an electric night for Iowans at different caucus sites.
When time was called inWest Des Moines, the results showed viability for Warren, Klobuchar, Buttigieg and Sanders – whom Alazzawi decided to caucus for. Neither Biden nor entrepreneur Andrew Yang, who placed fifth and sixth, met the viability threshold.
Another 15-minute round was called and supporters from other campaigns once again networked through the crowd, trying to convince the few supporters of US Representative Tulsi Gabbard and Senator Michael Bennett to join their group.
Yang’s group disbanded after holding on up until the last minute. Biden’s group, with help from former Iowa Governor Chet Culver, was able to swing enough supporters from other non-viable camps to squeak out a fourth-place win and hit the viable threshold. Sanders came out on top as the clear winner ofprecinct 118.
While political observers usually look to the top three candidates who emerge from the Iowa caucuses, many say the top four candidates are significant.
Continue Reading…

Continue Reading

Trending